You may wonder why work CANNOT be harnessed from Permanent Magnets. Yes, the Universe does appear to be governed by a set of rules. But, guess what – we've hardly a clue what many of those actually are. Yes, Science is better than ignorance.

Accepting the premise that energy cannot be created or destroyed. It certainly can be reused over and over again. Energy is often not thought of in this fashion, it's never consumed or "used up". When you use energy to perform work, you either diverge or spread it out, change its form, or a combination of both.

You still have all the energy remaining, after the work has been accomplished. So by simply capturing and recycling that energy, you can re-use it again, it does re-converge. The Law of Entropy and classical Thermodynamics without reservation assume single-pass energy collection. This activity then would not violate the law; it would just violate an assumption. It would not apply to the collecting and reusing process.

A magnetic assemblies can quite naturally collect energy from the same space simultaneously and over and over again. The emitted energy from the multi-collection process can be of a higher density than the operator is inputting. A coefficient-of-performance then would obviously be greater than one (COP>1) as measured by conventional means. The COP method of energy measurement is often confused with efficiency, which is inappropriate, and fails to correctly identify the performance.

We continue to use terms like "apparent" input of energy, which now should be reconsidered. Does a wind turbine or solar panel have no apparent input of energy?

Many also think that: "You cannot break the Lorentz Symmetry in your circuit or system, and thus violate the present Electrical Engineering Model, you will not, and cannot produce COP>1.0 via excess ‘free' EM energy utilized from the vacuum." I think Symmetry can be broken, replaced with anisotropy.

It's believed that: "Permanent magnets cannot perform work, that would violate the first and second Laws of Thermodynamics. The game is over, they just can't work. It's not a matter of looking for the one special arrangement that works among millions that don't. There is exactly ZERO arrangements that work". It probably comes to no surprise, I don't agree with this statement.

It's also accepted that: "The EMF induced in an electric circuit always acts in such a direction that the current it drives around a closed circuit produces a magnetic field which opposes the change in magnetic flux." I believe the virtual equal and opposite actions can be nullified or modified.

It's generally accepted that: "The normal field from a magnet as a bar with two opposite poles, one each end, only produces a conservative field. That is, when one integrates the force from that field around a closed path, the overall net force sums to a Vector ZERO. Hence, NO work can be performed."

Simply put, it takes as much "work" to separate two magnets as the repelling power they may offer – more with friction. So you end up with less than you began with, not more. A motor uses an electro-magnet, allowing one to "turn off" the opposing pole, or on – allowing it to perform work (at the expense an energy input of course).  I believe Vector Zero can be overcome. This can be accomplished without violating Thermodynamic Laws, although we may have to tread on a few incorrect, "assumptions".

If you have viewed my current You-Tube movement photo associated in the direction of magnetic element of the article, it could possibly need additional explanation. Please reference the video, "Can Magnets hold out Work?" (bdsolar), it provides an specific demonstration of what is discussed here.

Of program every one of us know: "Present science says it's NOT possible, that acceleration of an item by employing everlasting Magnets without any ‘LOCK-UP', demonstrating net obtain of vitality without any apparent input of energy." Ah, there's a rub. Perhaps, if we break Symmetry?

Let us look at a whole great offer more closely what is happening within our magnetic assemblies design within video, that people cannot "see". First, we have Asymmetric Dual static everlasting Magnets that create an attraction everlasting magnetic field, and Dual asymmetric PM Back-Drag that is understood as balanced, or symmetrical.

Everything appears, and behaves static, locked in place. It's just whatever you would presume from combining hundreds for the world's strongest Neodymium magnets. on this model, the magnetic attraction is so strong; just one cannot separate the magnets by hand. Two Tesla is produced in countless areas. This "static" problem exists between the rotor and observe stator at every one point.

However, the all round creations of every one magnetic field, such since the kinds within of the rotor itself, are very carefully positioned. once the electrical conducting and magnetic rotor enters the "field" and starts to proceed all problems change! The observe rail (stator) can be an electrical conductor (static field) along using the switching Dual everlasting Magnets induce a Motional EMF and deliver about currents to flow.

Yes, this produces an electromagnetic field, truly several. The 1st may be the space-filling electrical area produced with a altering magnetic field, the next may be the electrical area within a conductor when it moves by employing a magnetic field. These two forces sign up for to create an asymmetric situation. This permits a torque that is within our favor; the 1st imbalances within symmetry have begun!

Yet one more may be the magnet alloy product rotating by employing its individual magnetic field, which does not rotate using the actual elements. A rotating conductive magnet is detectable with the electrical area made when its no marketing price fees separate radially, because of in the direction of force made by rotation for the conductor within of its individual magnetic field. All of those actions are getting area simultaneously. The spinning along using the movement is magnetically induced and sustained just as in nature. The likeness of the universal macro effect dynamo remains to be designed at a micro scale with many asymmetrical induced changes.

The magnetic area and electrical area are inseparable. I would go so much concerning say they are practically a comparable entity, however they do coexist. It's one more dichotomy that stretches the limitations for the individual mind. Duality of energetic issue permits formations to simultaneously occupy two different realms.

Two mutually exclusive characteristics. producing utilization of specific Relativity, the electrical and magnetic fields are two factors for just about any comparable thing. A altering magnetic area is mathematically a comparable getting a switching magnetic field. So element of it is manifested as an electrical area component. It's apparent this several existence is not limited to two only fields of energy, but countless fields simultaneously.

The relative movement is instead a considerable factor. A time magnetic assemblies area produces an electrical field, along using the induced current within of the electrical area produces a magnetic field. This electromagnetic area interacts using the everlasting magnet just as one more PM would. The switching magnet assemblies create a electronic electromagnet, when it moves within of the exact proximity of the conductor.

A force between a permanent-magnet as well as a permanent-magnet may be designed equivalent to that between current-element and current-element. ongoing rotational movement is feasible between several PMs, contrary to conclusions, which could possibly appear to violate specific physics principals. As stated by Einstein, it is recognised that Maxwell's Electrodynamics, as understood when accustomed to switching bodies, certified prospects to asymmetries, which do not look to acquire inherent within phenomena.

How about one more arranged of electric-magnetic fields, by employing the dynamics of the slowly accelerating electron from rotation. As swiftly as this all starts the 1st magnetic back-drag and possible magnetic lock-up would usually be felt for the rotor, right away slowing and abruptly stopping the rotor. However, the magnetic pole back-drag usually experienced with everlasting magnets, which prevents an item from ongoing motion, along using the magnetic lock-up that stops all motion, is rise above with the all round effect for the many several induced secondary currents.

Combined forces create a uniform asymmetric area properly exceeding the drag and stopping the magnetic lock-up. The outcomes of back-drag practically cease to exist and lockup does not occur. As explained, the several dual sets of induced electromotive outcomes are because of in the direction of everlasting magnets rotation, as well as the rotor-conductors movement relative in the direction of asymmetric stators everlasting magnetic fields.

The process additional reinforces the magnets, which deliver about a whole great offer more current to acquire generated. The electrical currents, the moment in time started, are then adequate to sustain by themselves as well as enhance in potency and torque. The phenomenon appears to hold out very much getting a natural and organic dynamo or spiral in space does. If these actions truly remove the possible back-drag, or merely rise above this force is not specific – the effects will be the same.